The West distrust of Rajavi's gang

    Experiment of applying the MeK by America's most anti-Iranian parties- even during the war conditions- indicated that western countries have no plan to authentication of this terrorist group as an alternative or anything more than its current position, and from here, the MeK's crisis comes.

    If functions of the MeK's removal from America's terrorist list were:

    1. Getting rid of the political constraints, including the ban on the group's leadership to travel to other countries and especially her establishment in a European country, without security problems

    2. Easy financial exchange

    3. Taking permission to hold meetings under the group's logo

    4. Easier asylum for the group members who have been expelled from Iraq

    And if assessment of the MeK's leadership was true that the group's probable removal would have resulted in:

    1. Creating conflict between Iran and America

    2. Accessibility to the West

    Then:

    About the first part and especially on lifting restrictions of the MeK's leadership, the recent statement of the British government indicated that the western countries' sensitivity about this group doesn't relate to being on the terrorist list. But, even, they would pretext the Iranian government's reaction to deport Rajavi.

    About the MeK's financial exchanges, neither getting out of the list, nor any other score could lift restrictions of it, because these limitations are not external.

    Always, the most severe security rules have been governed this part of the MeK's proceedings, as a vital lifeline of the group's organization. Furthermore, the western countries' sensitivity in the MeK's financial exchanges, especially in regard with anti-money laundering rules, doesn't relate to the list, but is pursuing independently. So, the most part of the MeK's financial exchanges, due to illegality, Should be done secretly.

    Holding meetings under the MeK's logo should be assessed as a propaganda and psychological movement that has no function but trying to maintain the organization and the Rajavi's position on top of that. If holding meetings under the MeK's logo was helpful, the group's administrators were not obliged to resort to fake name and false ties.

    About taking asylum for the group members who have been expelled from Iraq, experience of other asylum- seeker populations who have clean records, and their requests have social aspect, indicates that getting out of the list doesn't facilitate taking asylum, a fact that the MeK's leadership admits.

    And about the MeK' leadership dreams and Illusions:

    The MeK' removal from the terrorist list, or retention on it, doesn't have an Influential role on the relations between Iran and the U.S. However, Iran has announced his sensitivity in this regard. Although the MeK have been applied as the west's bargaining chip against Iran, never has been a victim of western effort to establish relation with Iran and basically they are not in this place. If the MeK had such power, the West certainly would handed its leadership over to Iran.

    In fact, western countries never could cope with the MeK. Experiment of applying the MeK by America's most anti-Iranian parties- even during the war conditions- indicated that western countries have no plan to authentication of this terrorist group as an alternative or anything more than its current position, and from here, the MeK's crisis comes. The Indispensable point is that the West essentially considered the Rajavi's gang unreliable and dangerous, whether it was enemy of Iran, or not.

     

    Iran Didban

     

    Add new comment